Note #8
Letter to the editor
Letter to the editor
New York Times
Fifty Sixth Avenue
New York October 5, 2016
After reading your article about the negative
impression left upon interviewers by the casual tone of speech used by young
job candidates, there are certain points that struck a chord with me and I have decided
to discuss them with you.
When firms
decide to hire candidates, they take into account all aspects of the candidate’s
personality, behaviour and of course the kind of language they use. No matter
how qualified the applicant may be in their field of specialization, a failure
to comply with some previously established conventions in the business world
can detriment their chances at landing a job. This is more observable today
than ever with the exponential increase in the popularity of the internet and
the arrival of “text speech” into the world of linguistics. Text speech or
fingered speech has been used frequently since social media gained popularity.
Despite the popularity of this kind of speech, it is debatable as to what
extent it can be used. Fingered speech does have an aura of informality
therefore there is a limit to its usage. In formal environments such as
companies, young candidates who have grown up with fingered speech as the norm
falsely believe that it can be used in any context without any qualms about its
consequences.
You mention the excessive and hasty use of thank you’s which is
absolutely true. In a fast paced world, people increasingly fail to take the
time to contemplate a piece of text deeply and give structured responses. Young
workers are more likely to string together multiple unnecessary letters at the
end of what should have been a simple and sincere thank you, a practice most
likely carried forward from their teenage years. “From my Blackberry” at the
end of the message gives the impression of disinterest and a lack of
willingness to dedicate time and mental effort to the email and may sometimes
be perceived as being disrespectful. The usage of emoticons, as mentioned by
interviewers in your article, signals unprofessional behaviour and a lack of
gravitas that is required in a formal environment. Such practices hinder the
applications of job hunters, who may otherwise be stellar in other aspects.
Each form of speech has certain contexts and conventions and that must be
respected by these young candidates. The practice of formal communication
should start from a relatively young age so the transition as an adult is not bouldery.
Monica Panigrahy
Monica Panigrahy
I thought your letter was well written, and considered all aspects of the text it was written in response to. Your letter complements the original article, and gives an engaging response to it, and also goes for perhaps the less obvious approach of agreeing with the article rather than disagreeing.
ReplyDelete